Commentators often talk of the long decline of
industry in the British economy. In simple terms this is what we mean by
de-industrialization - a fall in the contribution made by the manufacturing
sector to national output, employment and income. We can consider manufacturing
as a whole, or focus on individual industries such as steel and clothing and textiles
De-industrialization is a long-term process of
structural change in an economy – leading to a change in the composition of
national output, and important alterations to the structure of our labour
market.
There is a number of different ways of measuring
the extent to which our manufacturing sector is experiencing
de-industrialization:
Its impact on the Indian Economy
The economic condition of India in the
19th century started becoming worse due to several polices of the British
government. The Indian manufacturing sector was sometimes sharply disrupted sue
to the import of machine made foreign goods. While analyzing the economic
impact of British rule and consequent poverty, Indian nationalists has quite
convincingly argued that British rule has de-industrialized India. However,
recent researches in modern economic history of India after independence has
challenged this widely accepted hypothesis on many grounds. To reach at final
analysis it is imperative to go through all major views of the scholars and
sources of information of different parts of 19th century India.
Drain of wealth the systematic policy of ferrying the economic
resources of India to Britain. The
officials of the British I government were paid out of the Indian exchequer
money went out of India.
There was a heavy tax t on the Indian people because large sums had to b
annually as interest on loans contracted by the Gove~ of India. It was
first time in India’s
history that the balance of trade t unfavorable towards India.
De-industrialization The British caused 1 Duos harm to the
traditional handicraft industry decayed beyond recovery. Heavy customs dutiE
imposed on Indian goods. The
British officials! Preference for European
goods. This provided an. to the demand for
European goods and contribute decline of Indian
handicrafts. The availability of n made goods in abundance at a comparatively
low H greatly contributed to the decline of Indian handicri failure of the
British Government to offer any protE indigenous industry also contributed to
the de Indian handicrafts because they could not compt machine-made goods
produced in bulk, and Consequently cheaper. With the subjugation of Indian princely
51 patronage to the handicraft industry ceased to exist.
Ruralisation Indian economy tended to more and more agricultural with the disintegration
traditional industries. The increase in the number 01 in agriculture. Did not
mean increase in agricultural, but impoverishment of the rural masses; then
industrial alternative.
This accounted for the famines and increasing
poverty in the 19th and quarter of the 20th century. India merely became of raw material for
industrial Britain.
No comments:
Post a Comment